About Dhyro
Built for teams that cannot afford messy approvals
After years of watching DSAR responses, content approvals, and client work run through email threads and spreadsheets, we built Dhyro to give those workflows a real system.
Our story
From ad hoc workflows to engines
Dhyro started as an internal tool to bring structure, guardrails, and audit trails to a few high-risk workflows. What worked there became the engines you see today.
Dhyro started after more than a decade building and running workflows in tools like Jira, spreadsheets, and ticketing systems for teams that had to get approvals right every single time.
Over and over, the same pattern showed up: high‑risk work like DSAR responses, content approvals, and client delivery was being held together with ad hoc checklists, email threads, and side channels in chat. Nothing felt truly auditable, and no one could see where a request was stuck.
Dhyro is the product of that frustration. It is a focused system for teams that live in approvals, where you need automation to move work forward but also need to prove who did what, when, and why.
How we work
Principles behind every engine
Every engine we ship follows the same set of principles.
Human approvals where risk exists
Routine steps can be automated, but high‑impact decisions always route through a named approver with clear context and history.
Auditability by default
Every workflow captures a chronological trail of actions, comments, and approvals so you can answer “who touched this?” in seconds—not days.
Controlled automation, not chaos
Automations are explicit and reviewable. Guardrails and exception paths are built in so nothing critical disappears into a black box.
Start narrow, then expand
Teams begin with one high‑risk workflow, prove value, and only then roll engines out to adjacent processes to avoid big‑bang failures.